Introduction and first proof of God.
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2025 9:25 pm
The Neon Moon (Intro to the Proof of God)
Imagine for a moment a different world. A world where the moon had a glowing neon sign across its surface that read: “Made by God.” If there really were such a sign, you can be sure there would be teams of scientists and skeptics working around the clock to explain how random processes somehow etched those glowing words into the lunar surface. Life would be very different in that world—but so would God. The kind of being that leaves a flashy, cosmic billboard is not one that would value true freedom of thought and action. And make no mistake about it—freedom is at the heart of this question, whether there is a God or not.
There are really only two possible answers to the greatest question of all: either everything we see came to be through blind, unguided processes—or it came to be through intelligence, intention, and design. There is no middle ground. One or the other must be true. And once again, freedom is central. If life is the result of unguided forces, then our freedom is an illusion—every thought, choice, and desire is nothing more than chemical reactions set in motion long before we were born. But if life is the result of a Creator, then freedom is real by design. It is a gift, meant for growth, discovery, and relationship.
That means the evidence we examine should not be vague or unhelpful. It should lean decisively one way or the other. If unguided processes are the explanation, then we would expect reality to reflect randomness, accident, and chaos—patterns stitched together by chance alone. But if God is the explanation, then we would expect reality to reflect order, purpose, and a brilliance that cannot be reduced to luck. And above all, we would expect a universe where freedom is so deep that we can even choose to deny the very One who gave it.
If you do a search on YouTube about free will, you’ll hear it repeated again and again—even from leading scientists: there is no free will. They insist the laws of physics leave no room for it. What laws are they talking about, and why are they so confident? They’re pointing to the Standard Model of physics—the mathematical framework that describes matter, energy, and their interactions. And under this model, everything in the universe is said to be determined with infinite precision. In this picture, every particle’s position, every atom’s behavior, every motion of the cosmos is fixed with infinite determinism. Nothing is free. Nothing escapes the math. The universe is a perfect machine—and you are simply a gear turning exactly as it must.
That view is exactly what we would expect if there is no God. But if God exists and created the universe, we would expect the opposite: a reality where freedom is real, where determinism cannot be absolute. So here’s the question: what if the deterministic view is wrong—impossibly wrong? What if it is literally impossible for the universe to operate on infinite determinism? What if the only way the universe could run is by an undetermined framework—exactly as we would expect if it were created by God?
The shocking truth is this: the Standard Model of math, as it has been understood for over a century, carries a hidden flaw. A flaw that has long been overlooked as inconsequential—yet it is, in fact, a universe killer.
The Infinite Information Problem
The Standard Model leans on real numbers—numbers with infinite decimal places, like 0.333… or π. On paper, this makes sense: real numbers let the equations describe particle positions, velocities, and energies with infinite precision. But here’s the catch: if determinism were true in the physical world, the universe would have to store and compute infinite information in every particle. Every location in space, every quantum state, would require a string of digits stretching on forever.
That is not just unlikely. It is impossible. No physical system can encode infinite data. Even black holes—the densest objects in the cosmos—demonstrate this limit. The Bekenstein bound and black hole entropy show that there is a maximum amount of information that can be stored in any region of space. The laws of physics themselves scream that infinite precision cannot exist in reality. Which means the entire idea of infinite determinism collapses. If the world ran on real numbers the way materialists imagine, the universe would have destroyed itself long ago. It is a universe killer.
And yet, real numbers undeniably exist—but not in the wild machinery of physics. Instead, they are embedded in the abstract structure of mathematics itself, waiting for conscious beings to discover them. With real numbers, we calculate trajectories, build bridges, cure diseases, and launch rockets to the stars. They are a tool for life and mind—but only for life and mind. Outside of that context, real numbers are toxic. In the unconscious, physical universe, they demand infinite information, and infinite information is impossible.
This is the paradox at the heart of reality: mathematics contains depths that the physical world cannot carry on its own. The hidden infinity of real numbers was always there, but only beings with consciousness could use it safely. Which means the very structure of mathematics seems aimed—not at chaos, not at blind determinism—but at discovery, freedom, and life. Exactly what we would expect if the universe was created by a God who designed it as a place where minds could awaken.
There is a ton more that will be placed here as time goes on.
There are many examples of the things that are built into the unvierse that only make sense if there is a God, that he made all of this for consciousness and that he wanted freedom to be key.
Imagine for a moment a different world. A world where the moon had a glowing neon sign across its surface that read: “Made by God.” If there really were such a sign, you can be sure there would be teams of scientists and skeptics working around the clock to explain how random processes somehow etched those glowing words into the lunar surface. Life would be very different in that world—but so would God. The kind of being that leaves a flashy, cosmic billboard is not one that would value true freedom of thought and action. And make no mistake about it—freedom is at the heart of this question, whether there is a God or not.
There are really only two possible answers to the greatest question of all: either everything we see came to be through blind, unguided processes—or it came to be through intelligence, intention, and design. There is no middle ground. One or the other must be true. And once again, freedom is central. If life is the result of unguided forces, then our freedom is an illusion—every thought, choice, and desire is nothing more than chemical reactions set in motion long before we were born. But if life is the result of a Creator, then freedom is real by design. It is a gift, meant for growth, discovery, and relationship.
That means the evidence we examine should not be vague or unhelpful. It should lean decisively one way or the other. If unguided processes are the explanation, then we would expect reality to reflect randomness, accident, and chaos—patterns stitched together by chance alone. But if God is the explanation, then we would expect reality to reflect order, purpose, and a brilliance that cannot be reduced to luck. And above all, we would expect a universe where freedom is so deep that we can even choose to deny the very One who gave it.
If you do a search on YouTube about free will, you’ll hear it repeated again and again—even from leading scientists: there is no free will. They insist the laws of physics leave no room for it. What laws are they talking about, and why are they so confident? They’re pointing to the Standard Model of physics—the mathematical framework that describes matter, energy, and their interactions. And under this model, everything in the universe is said to be determined with infinite precision. In this picture, every particle’s position, every atom’s behavior, every motion of the cosmos is fixed with infinite determinism. Nothing is free. Nothing escapes the math. The universe is a perfect machine—and you are simply a gear turning exactly as it must.
That view is exactly what we would expect if there is no God. But if God exists and created the universe, we would expect the opposite: a reality where freedom is real, where determinism cannot be absolute. So here’s the question: what if the deterministic view is wrong—impossibly wrong? What if it is literally impossible for the universe to operate on infinite determinism? What if the only way the universe could run is by an undetermined framework—exactly as we would expect if it were created by God?
The shocking truth is this: the Standard Model of math, as it has been understood for over a century, carries a hidden flaw. A flaw that has long been overlooked as inconsequential—yet it is, in fact, a universe killer.
The Infinite Information Problem
The Standard Model leans on real numbers—numbers with infinite decimal places, like 0.333… or π. On paper, this makes sense: real numbers let the equations describe particle positions, velocities, and energies with infinite precision. But here’s the catch: if determinism were true in the physical world, the universe would have to store and compute infinite information in every particle. Every location in space, every quantum state, would require a string of digits stretching on forever.
That is not just unlikely. It is impossible. No physical system can encode infinite data. Even black holes—the densest objects in the cosmos—demonstrate this limit. The Bekenstein bound and black hole entropy show that there is a maximum amount of information that can be stored in any region of space. The laws of physics themselves scream that infinite precision cannot exist in reality. Which means the entire idea of infinite determinism collapses. If the world ran on real numbers the way materialists imagine, the universe would have destroyed itself long ago. It is a universe killer.
And yet, real numbers undeniably exist—but not in the wild machinery of physics. Instead, they are embedded in the abstract structure of mathematics itself, waiting for conscious beings to discover them. With real numbers, we calculate trajectories, build bridges, cure diseases, and launch rockets to the stars. They are a tool for life and mind—but only for life and mind. Outside of that context, real numbers are toxic. In the unconscious, physical universe, they demand infinite information, and infinite information is impossible.
This is the paradox at the heart of reality: mathematics contains depths that the physical world cannot carry on its own. The hidden infinity of real numbers was always there, but only beings with consciousness could use it safely. Which means the very structure of mathematics seems aimed—not at chaos, not at blind determinism—but at discovery, freedom, and life. Exactly what we would expect if the universe was created by a God who designed it as a place where minds could awaken.
There is a ton more that will be placed here as time goes on.
There are many examples of the things that are built into the unvierse that only make sense if there is a God, that he made all of this for consciousness and that he wanted freedom to be key.